Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Brief Communication - Nursing
Case Report
Case Series
CEO message
CEO’s Message
Clinical Image
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Brief Communication - Nursing
Case Report
Case Series
CEO message
CEO’s Message
Clinical Image
Editorial
Guest Editorial
Invited Editorial
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Series
4 (
2
); 96-99
doi:
10.25259/WJWCH_25_2025

The X factor: An overview of triple X syndrome

Department of Pediatrics, Genetic Clinic, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Department of Obstetric and Gynaecology, Perinatology, Nowrosjee Wadia Maternity Hospital, Seth GS Medical College, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

*Corresponding author: Ami Shah, Department of Pediatrics, Genetic Clinic, Bai Jerbai Wadia Hospital for Children, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. drami.rajesh.shah@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Shah A, Bansal V. The X factor: An overview of triple X syndrome. Wadia J Women Child Health. 2025;4:96-9. doi: 10.25259/ WJWCH_25_2025

Abstract

Triple X syndrome (TXS) is a relatively common but underdiagnosed sex chromosomal abnormality since incidence / prevelance of normal phenotype is not defined. Available literature largely highlights the congenital abnormalities and post-natal morbidities associated with this condition. There has been an apparent rise in cases of TXS with increasing use of pre-natal genetic testing. Counseling can be difficult for medical professionals in view of extreme variability of the phenotype especially in prenatal cases. We describe our experience with TXS at the Genetic and Perinatology clinic, Wadia hospital and also review the available literature.

Keywords

47
XXX
Genetic counseling
Pre-natal diagnosis
Triple X syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Triple X syndrome (TXS) is a sex chromosome abnormality, with a 47,XXX karyotype, where a female carries an extra X chromosome. First reported in 1959, TXS has a worldwide incidence of 1/1000.[1] Only 10% cases are diagnosed, those with mild or normal phenotype usually remain undiagnosed.[2] Congenital malformations and post-natal neurodevelopmental delay are known but rare.[3] These aspects make counseling challenging, especially in pre-natal and/or incidental cases. Thus, it is important for reproductive and child healthcare professionals to have complete information regarding the diagnosis and management of TXS.

EXPERIENCE AT WADIA PERINATOLOGY CLINIC

We describe four families with TXS diagnosis [Table 1].

Table 1: Summary of cases at Wadia Hospital – Genetic and Perinatology Clinic.
Type of conception Family 1 Family 2 Family 3 Family 4
IVF, Self gametes Normal Normal Normal
Consanguinity Non-consanguineous marriage
Reason for testing Dual marker high risk for aneuploidy
NIPT high risk for trisomy of sex chromosome
Last POC showed copy number variation−chromosome 22 deletion+duplication Abnormal anomaly scan Abnormal NT scan
USG No major abnormality - TOF+mega cisterna magna Absent NB at 12 weeks
Normal NB in follow-up scan
Mode of testing NIPT+Amniocentesis Couple karyotype Amniocentesis Amniocentesis
Decision Continued Wife diagnosed at 33 years Aborted Lost to follow-up
Result SGA baby, NICU stay+ Conceived again - -

NB: Nasal bone, NT: Nuchal translucency, NIPT: Non-invasive pre-natal test, NICU: Neonatal intensive care, TOF: Tetralogy of fallot, IVF:In vitro fertilization, POC: Product of conception, SGA: Small for gestational age, USG: Ultrasound sonography

Case 1

A 40-year-old female, conceived by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using self-gametes, showed an increased risk for trisomy 21, 18 on dual marker test. Later, non-invasive pre-natal test (NIPT) was positive for trisomy of sex chromosomes. Hence amniocentesis was done and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), Karyotype showed TXS. The ultrasound scans and fetal echo were normal. Post-counseling, they decided to continue the pregnancy. A female neonate was, delivered at 34 weeks by cesarean section, and required 3-week neonatal intensive care unit stay due to low birth weight (1.58 kg) and respiratory distress. She had no dysmorphism or congenital malformations. Post–discharge, she continued to have poor weight gain and was readmitted at 2 months for sepsis. She had a stormy course with bleeding issues and hepatic involvement likely secondary to the infection and succumbed to her illness.

Case 2

A 33 year old female and her 40 year old husband were referred for counseling and evaluation following detection of a deletion and duplication in chromosome 22q region in product of conception from missed abortion. Couple karyotype was done for structural defects such as translocation, which incidentally revealed TXS in her. On enquiry, she had a normal birth and development history and was a working professional. She had no dysmorphism or congenital malformations on evaluation.

Case 3

A 42-year-old female with spontaneous conception had a normal early pregnancy screening. At 28 weeks of scan, tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) was detected, which was confirmed on fetal echo. Amniocentesis showed TXS on FISH report. After counseling, the couple decided to discontinue in view of poor prognosis due to the cardiac anomaly.

Case 4

A 38-year-old female presented with delayed nasal bone (NB) ossification during their second spontaneous conception with normal serum markers. Amniocentesis showed TXS on FISH report. NB was visible on follow-up scan, and no other congenital abnormalities were seen. The couple was lost to follow-up thereafter.

ABOUT TXS

The literature for TXS is biased, with most of the cases having rare findings being reported. With increase in NIPT and prenatal testing, unsuspecting pregnancies with TXS are being diagnosed more frequently. Long-term outcome studies following pre-natal diagnosis and incidental TXS are limited.

Pathophysiology

TXS occurs due to non-disjunction in meiosis I, with 90% being maternal in origin.[4] The phenotype is a medley of X inactivation and overexpression of genes that escape inactivation. Although the exact cause for abnormal phenotype in TXS is yet to be determined, it is known that there are multiple genes for neurodevelopmental, behavioral issues, and other systemic function on X chromosome, which can manifest individually or in combination.[5,6]

Diagnosing TXS

Cytogenetic tests such as karyotype, FISH, and quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction QF-PCR are test of choice. Antenatal testing is usually advised for advanced maternal age, abnormal serum markers like alpha fetoprotein, screen positive NIPT, and ultrasound abnormalities. This is like our group where a positive NIPT[1] and abnormal fetal ultrasound scan[3,5] resulted in testing. Behavioral and intellectual disabilities are common indication for post-natal testing. Rarely, dysmorphisms such as Pierre Robin sequence, hemihypertrophy, and congenital heart defects may prompt evaluation.[5]

Phenotype

Our case 2 represents the large subset of TXS without any congenital defects, developmental or intellectual abnormalities. The incidence of this normal phenotype is unknown since they are rarely detected as in our case.

Pre-natal features: though rare, they have been reported, the most common being fetal hydrops and septal cardiac defects.[7,8] There are many single case reports for various other findings like oligohydramnios, intraoral mass, cleft lip and palate, post-axial polydactyly, syndactyly, bronchogenic cyst, dysplastic kidneys, and duodenal atresia.[4] Complex heart defects such as TOF and delayed appearance of NB seen in our series have not been reported.

Post-natal features

Physical

Postnatally growth parameters range from below average to average at birth, but with age, they tend to be taller. Ambiguous genitalia, club foot, and cardiac defects have been reported. Some may have subtle but minor dysmorphisms such as hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, clinodactyly, and pes planus.[5]

Development

Majority of TXS women have normal neurocognitive development.[8] Speech and language difficulties are common childhood delays, followed by academic difficulties such as learning disorders. Intelligent quotient can range from slow learner to above average, and intellectual disability is rare. Behavioral issues such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and autism are more common in postnatally diagnosed cases.[5,9] Prenatally diagnosed TXS women undergo early testing and intervention, resulting in better developmental outcomes. Psychiatric disorders are common in TXS women.[8]

Medical

Urogenital and neurological disorders are the most common post-natal systemic findings. Ovarian, renal dysgenesis, and epilepsy of various types have been reported in respective systems. Rare findings include dental abnormalities, spinal abnormalities, immunodeficiency, and endocrine disorders.[3,4]

Reproduction

Most TXS women have normal sexual development and fertility. They can conceive and give birth to healthy babies since the extra X chromosome is generally not passed on.[3] There have been few reports of early or delayed puberty, ovarian abnormalities, and premature ovarian failure.[4,10] Risks of non-sex chromosomal aneuploidies in their progenies like in our family 2 are the same as normal age-matched population risk and cannot be attributed to TXS.

Points for counseling

Genetic counseling for TXS is same as for other disorders and should include complete information of the condition - How and why it occurs, source i.e. inherited or de novo, spectrum of clinical features, treatment options if any and prognosis. Pre-natal counseling should be non-directive, highlighting the extreme phenotypic variability and that most are normal females, just like their peers. Discuss the management, prognosis of congenital abnormalities if detected in fetal period and post-natal neurodevelopmental outcomes. How these should be suspected and monitored postnatally should also be expanded upon.

Outcomes of pre-natal counseling - Couples with incidental fetal diagnosis of TXS commonly struggle in understanding the condition and to take an appropriate reproductive decision. Most TXS pregnancies without congenital anomalies are continued following appropriate counseling.[3] A favorable outcome was reported in these cases, with parents satisfied by their decision to continue.[8]

CONCLUSION

TXS is a common disorder. The cause for its vast but skewed phenotypic spectrum is yet to be determined, but is likely to be multifactorial. With increasing pre-natal and incidental diagnosis, medical professionals need to share objective information regarding the disorder and its outcome during counseling.

Ethical approval:

Institutional review board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . Evidence for the existence of the human 'super female' Lancet. 1959;274:423-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Sex chromosome abnormalities found among 34,910 newborn children: Results from a 13-year incidence study in Arhus, Denmark. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1990;26:209-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Triple X syndrome: A review of the literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2010;18:265-71.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Prenatal diagnosis and prognosis of triple X syndrome: 47, XXX. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2009;38:599-603.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Expanding the phenotype of triple X syndrome: A comparison of prenatal versus postnatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170:2870-81.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Triple X syndrome with rare phenotypic presentation. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75:629-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Fetal hydrops associated with 47,XXX: A case report and literature review. Cureus. 2024;16:e62552.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , , et al. Triple X syndrome: Characteristics of 42 Italian girls and parental emotional response to prenatal diagnosis. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:1255-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Early neurodevelopmental and medical profile in children with sex chromosome trisomies: Background for the prospective eXtraordinarY babies study to identify early risk factors and targets for intervention. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020;184:428-43.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Triple X syndrome: A rare case entity with premature ovarian failure, recurrent abortion and secondary infertility. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;5:1663-5.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections