Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Brief Communication - Nursing
Case Report
Case Series
CEO message
CEO’s Message
Clinical Image
Editorial
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Brief Communication
Brief Communication - Nursing
Case Report
Case Series
CEO message
CEO’s Message
Clinical Image
Editorial
Invited Review
Letter to Editor
Narrative Review
Original Article
Pictorial Essay
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Case Report
4 (
1
); 52-55
doi:
10.25259/WJWCH_43_2024

Term baby with central hypotonia: Neonatal presentation of a rare disease - A case report

Department of Neonatology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Neonatology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

*Corresponding author: R. R. Prashanth, Department of Neonatology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Child Health, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. prash2635@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Byadarahalli Keshavamurthy B, Prashanth RR, Bandiya P, Hunasanahalli Shivanna N. Term baby with central hypotonia: Neonatal presentation of a rare disease - A case report. Wadia J Women Child Health. 2025;4:52-5. doi: 10.25259/WJWCH_43_2024

Abstract

We report a term baby born with global central hypotonia with significant feeding difficulty noted since birth. Even though the antenatal course is uneventful, this neonate is born small for gestational age and has low birth weight, abnormal facial features, bilateral undescended testis, and significant hypotonia. He has a poor repertoire of movements and a typical frog-like posture. The muscle power and deep tendon reflexes are normal. All these features point toward a central cause of hypotonia. The neonate also has significant feeding of difficulty and the requirement of low-flow oxygen therapy. The presentation mimics perinatal asphyxia with sequelae hypoxic ischemic injury; however, neurosonogram, magnetic resonance imaging brain, and amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram all are normal. A clinical diagnosis of Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) is suspected and a specific genetic test that is methylation study is sent and confirms the diagnosis of PWS. The neonate is started on early intervention, and swallowing exercises and is discharged successfully on breastfeeding.

Keywords

Central hypotonia
Neonatal hypotonia
Neonate
Prader–Willi syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Central hypotonia in the neonatal period presents a significant diagnostic and management challenge. Among the various genetic etiologies, Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) is an important and relatively common cause. It is characterised by hallmark features including pronounced hypotonia, poor feeding, hypogonadism, and distinctive craniofacial features. This case report highlights the early clinical presentation of PWS in the neonatal period, the diagnostic dilemmas encountered, and the approach to management in a resource-constrained NICU setting.

CASE REPORT

A male newborn was delivered through cesarean section at 37 weeks of gestation from a third-degree consanguineous marriage to a 25-year-old multigravida mother. He presented with generalized hypotonia at birth. The mother’s prenatal course was uneventful, with no significant medical issues or obstetric complications. Her antenatal scans showed no abnormalities, such as polyhydramnios, and there was no history of decreased fetal movements.

The neonate did not cry immediately after birth and had appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) scores of 4 and 6 at 1 and 5 min of life, respectively. He required resuscitation with bag and mask ventilation for 30 s and, then, had good spontaneous respiratory efforts. However, at 5 min of life, he had mild respiratory distress requiring low-flow oxygen therapy (1 L/min with fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 25%). There was no history of seizures. Anthropometry as per the World Health Organization growth chart is as follows: Birth weight: 2400 g (3rd–10th centile), head circumference 34.5 cm (10th– 50th centile), and length 50 cm (10th–50th centile).

On examination, he had an abnormal face with a prominent forehead, depressed nasal bridge with a pointed tip of nose, prominent gum, downturned mouth, small mandible [Figure 1], and small scrotum with decreased rugae with bilateral undescended testis [Figure 2]. He had poor responsiveness to external stimuli, a weak cry, and a poor repertoire of spontaneous movements. Rooting and sucking reflexes were reduced; however, there was no drooling of saliva or pooling of secretions. The posture of the neonate appeared “frog-like” with abduction at the bilateral hip and arm, with complete head lag suggestive of global hypotonia [Figure 3]. Power in the muscles of both upper and lower limbs was normal. Deep tendon reflexes were also normal. There was no hepatosplenomegaly, and the rest of the systemic examination was normal.

Prominent forehead, downturned mouth, and protuberant abdomen with frog-like posture.
Figure 1:
Prominent forehead, downturned mouth, and protuberant abdomen with frog-like posture.
Bilateral undescended testis.
Figure 2:
Bilateral undescended testis.
Head lag suggesting hypotonia.
Figure 3:
Head lag suggesting hypotonia.

Differential diagnosis

  • Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS)

  • Congenital hypothyroidism

  • Congenital myasthenia

  • Peroxisomal disorder.

Further course

Neurological examination of the parents was normal. There were no family members with similar illnesses.

A detailed evaluation of hypotonia was as follows: Thyroid function test was normal. Serum calcium (both total and ionized), serum magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride, and creatine phosphokinase levels were all within normal limits. Ultrasonography of the cranium and abdomen revealed a normal study. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalogram was normal. Genetic assessment (methylation study) was abnormal which showed deletion in chromosome 15q11.2–13.1

The main challenge faced was the establishment of oral feeds and the continued requirement of low-flow oxygen support. An oromotor stimulation plan with exercises to facilitate coordinated sucking and swallowing was taught to the mother and these exercises were performed before each feed. A multidisciplinary team involving the occupational therapist, lactation counselor, and neonatologist taught the mother the technique of milk expression, cup and spoon feeds, and a gradual transition to breastfeeding which was established by day 18 of life (DOL-18). The neonate’s arousal response gradually improved with improvement in the repertoire of spontaneous movements. The neonate was discharged on the day of life 28 with a weight of 2700 g on early intervention for hypotonia and breastfeeding, and parents were also counseled by a geneticist.

Actual diagnosis

PWS (Chr 15q11.2–13.1 deletion).

DISCUSSION

PWS is a disorder of genetic imprinting with maternal disomy wherein both the maternal genes are on the proximal part of the long arm of chromosome 15, with del15 (q11q13) seen in up to 70% cases. The reported incidence is about one in 10,000–15,000 live birth.[1]

The prenatal presentation of PWS includes decreased fetal movements, fetal malpresentation, severe intra-uterine growth restriction, and polyhydramnios.[2] In the index, neonate however has no such features antenatally.

Although there are no specific diagnostic criteria for children 3 years or younger, the diagnosis of PWS can be made based on the diagnostic criteria, as mentioned in Table 1.[3]

Table 1: Diagnostic criteria for Prader–Willi syndrome.
Major Minor Supportive
Neonatal and infantile central hypotonia with poor suck, gradually improving with age Decreased fetal movement or infantile lethargy or weak cry in infancy, improving with age High pain threshold
Feeding problems, poor weight gain/failure to thrive Behavior problems – temper tantrums, violent outbursts, and obsessive/compulsive behavior; tendency to be argumentative, oppositional, rigid, manipulative, possessive, and suborn; and perseverating, stealing, and lying (five or more of these symptoms required) Decreased vomiting
Excessive or rapid weight gain on weight-for-length chart (crossing two centile channels) after 12 months but before 6 years of age; central obesity in the absence of intervention Sleep disturbance or sleep apnea Temperature instability in infancy or altered temperature sensitivity in older children and adults
Characteristic facial features with dolichocephaly, narrow face or bifrontal diameter, almond-shaped eyes, small-appearing mouth with thin upper lip, down-turned corners of the mouth (3 or more required) Short stature by age 15 (in the absence of growth hormone intervention) Scoliosis and/or kyphosis
(a) Hypogonadism – with any of the following, depending on age: Genital hypoplasia male: Scrotal hypoplasia, cryptorchidism, small penis and/or testes for age [<5thpercentile]; female: Absence or severe hypoplasia of labia minora and/or clitoris.
(b) Delayed or incomplete gonadal maturation with delayed pubertal signs in the absence of intervention after 16 years of age (male: Small gonads, decreased facial and body hair, lack of voice change; female: Amenorrhea/oligomenorrhea after age 16)
Hypopigmentation – fair skin and hair compared to family Early adrenarche
Global developmental delay in a child younger than
6 years of age; mild to moderate mental retardation or learning problems in older children
Small hands (<25thpercentile) and/or feet
(<10thpercentile) for height age
Osteoporosis
Hyperphagia/food foraging/obsession with food Narrow hands with straight ulnar border Unusual skill with jigsaw puzzles
Deletion 15q11–13 or other cytogenetic/molecular abnormality of the Prader–Willi chromosome region, including maternal disomy Eye abnormalities (esotropia and myopia) Normal neuromuscular studies
Thick viscous saliva with crusting at corners of the mouth
Speech articulation defects
Skin picking

Major criteria are weighted at one point each. Minor criteria are weighed at one-half point. Children 3 years of age or younger: Five points are required for diagnosis, four of which should come from the major group. The index neonate had five major and one minor criteria with a score of 5.5, leading to the diagnosis of PWS.

The clinical phenotype of PWS has two distinct phases: The “neonatal hypotonia” phase and the later “hyperphagic” phase. Problems related to feeding form the core management issue in the neonatal period, which feeding difficulty seen in up to 90% of neonates.[3] As in our index neonate, the factors predisposing for this include (A) reduced oromotor tone (B) poor and immature suck reflex (C) swallowing dysfunction. The incoordination of the suck-swallow and breathing is a major hindrance to the establishment of breastfeeding. This feeding difficulty often leads to severe failure to thrive by 6 months of age in 15% of infants.[4] This is complicated further compounded by the presence of endocrine dysfunction due to growth hormone deficiency and hypogonadism seen in later infancy. The average duration of requirement of tube feeding in neonates with PWS is 15-35 days. However in this index neonate we were able to establish breastfeeding by DOL-18. Following this phase, certain infants have a phase of excessive weight gain leading to obesity and this is due to orexin stimulation due to neurological dysfunction. Hypotonia is another universal finding in neonates with PWS. This is considered secondary to inactivating mutations in the MAGEL2 gene.[5] This is non-progressive and tends to improve by 8–11 months of age.[6]

PWS is the result of a de novo genetic alteration with most families having a recurrence risk of <1%. With early recognition and structured follow-up care, the children have a better quality of life and survival up to 45 years.[7]

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should suspect Prader–Willi syndrome (PWS) in neonates presenting with global hypotonia, feeding difficulties, and characteristic facial features, even in the absence of antenatal markers. Prompt initiation of oromotor stimulation, early intervention and structured feeding therapy in the NICU setting is essential to facilitate early establishment of breastfeeding, Regular follow-up is critical to monitor for and manage potential complications such as growth failure, obesity, and endocrine dysfunction. All these significantly improve long-term quality of life and developmental outcomes in affected infants.

Ethical approval:

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. . Prader-Willi syndrome: A neonatology success story. Neoreviews. 2005;6:e559-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Can fetal ultrasound result in prenatal diagnosis of Prader-Willi syndrome? Genet Couns. 2011;22:207-16.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Prader-willi syndrome In: , , , , , , eds. GeneReviews. Seattle, WA: University of Washington; .
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , , , et al. Nutritional phases in Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2011;155A:1040-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Muscle dysfunction caused by loss of Magel2 in a mouse model of Prader-Willi and Schaaf-Yang syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25:3798-809.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Hypotonic infants and the Prader-Willi syndrome. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2000;76:246-50.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Causes of death in Prader-Willi syndrome: Prader-Willi Syndrome association (USA) 40-year mortality survey. Genet Med. 2017;19:635-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections